Creepshot: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Jump to: Main Page • Micropedia • Macropedia • Icons • Time Line • History • Life Lessons • Links • Help
Chat rooms • What links here • Copyright info • Contact information • Category:Root
(Created page with "{{Header|Creepshot 12/21}} A '''creep shot''' is a photo, taken surreptitiously and without their permission, of a person or part of a person whom the photographer finds attr...") |
m (Text replacement - "controversy" to "controversy") |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Such photography is unlikely to be illegal if there is no specific violation of ordinary expectations of privacy, but this should be checked locally. However, it may be annoying to the other person and if done persistently might be regarded as a breach of the peace or harassment. | Such photography is unlikely to be illegal if there is no specific violation of ordinary expectations of privacy, but this should be checked locally. However, it may be annoying to the other person and if done persistently might be regarded as a breach of the peace or harassment. | ||
In 2012, the publication of creep shots of a member of the British royal family topless caused considerable controversy and led to legal action. [http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/09/28/kate-middleton-naked-pictures-bottomless-_n_1923378.html?GEP] | In 2012, the publication of creep shots of a member of the British royal family topless caused considerable [[controversy]] and led to legal action. [http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/09/28/kate-middleton-naked-pictures-bottomless-_n_1923378.html?GEP] | ||
<gallery mode="packed" heights="300px" caption=""> | <gallery mode="packed" heights="300px" caption=""> | ||
Latest revision as of 05:38, 24 January 2023
A creep shot is a photo, taken surreptitiously and without their permission, of a person or part of a person whom the photographer finds attractive. For example, it might be of the breasts of someone in a tight top, the bottom of someone in a tight miniskirt or leggings, or of a woman in a bikini.
Such photography is unlikely to be illegal if there is no specific violation of ordinary expectations of privacy, but this should be checked locally. However, it may be annoying to the other person and if done persistently might be regarded as a breach of the peace or harassment.
In 2012, the publication of creep shots of a member of the British royal family topless caused considerable controversy and led to legal action. [1]
See also
Chat rooms • What links here • Copyright info • Contact information • Category:Root