Sexual ethics: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "{{Header|Sexual ethics 03/21}} '''Sexual ethics''' or '''sex ethics''' (also '''sexual morality''') is a branch of philosophy that considers the ethics or morality or otherwis...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
==Terminology and philosophical context== | ==Terminology and philosophical context== | ||
The terms ethics and morality are often used interchangeably, but sometimes ethics is reserved for interpersonal interactions and morality is used to cover both interpersonal and inherent questions. | The terms ethics and morality are often used interchangeably, but sometimes ethics is reserved for interpersonal interactions and morality is used to cover both interpersonal and inherent questions. | ||
Different approaches to applied ethics hold different views on inherent morality, for example: | Different approaches to applied ethics hold different views on inherent morality, for example: | ||
Revision as of 22:22, 3 March 2021
Sexual ethics or sex ethics (also sexual morality) is a branch of philosophy that considers the ethics or morality or otherwise in sexual behavior. Sexual ethics seeks to understand, evaluate and critique interpersonal relationships and sexual activities from a social, cultural, and philosophical perspective. Some people consider aspects of human sexuality, such as gender identification and sexual orientation, as well as consent, sexual relations and procreation, as giving rise to issues of sexual ethics.
Historically, the prevailing notions of what is regarded as sexually ethical have been linked to religious teachings. More recently, the feminist movement has emphasized personal choice and consent in sexual activities.
Terminology and philosophical context
The terms ethics and morality are often used interchangeably, but sometimes ethics is reserved for interpersonal interactions and morality is used to cover both interpersonal and inherent questions.
Different approaches to applied ethics hold different views on inherent morality, for example:
- Moral nihilism is the meta-ethical view that nothing is inherently right or wrong, and that all value judgments are either human constructs or meaningless.
- Moral relativism is the meta-ethical view that moral judgments are subjective. In some cases this is merely descriptive, in other cases this approach is normative – the idea that morality should be judged in the context of each culture's convictions and practices.
- Moral universalism is the meta-ethical view that moral judgments are objectively true or false, that everyone should behave according to the same set of normative ethics.
Many practical questions arise regarding human sexuality, such as whether sexual norms should be enforced by law, given social approval, or changed. Answers to these questions can sometimes be considered on a scale from social liberalism to social conservatism. Considerable controversy continues over which system of ethics or morality best promotes human happiness and prosperity.
- More information is available at [ Wikipedia:Sexual_ethics ]
Use template:{{sex-related}}
Chat rooms • What links here • Copyright info • Contact information • Category:Root