Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction (from Latin juris 'law' and dictio 'speech' or 'declaration') is the legal term for the legal authority granted to a legal entity to enact justice. In federations like the United States, the concept of jurisdiction applies at multiple levels (e.g., local, state, and federal).
Jurisdiction derives its substance from international law, conflict of laws, constitutional law, and the authorities of the executive and legislative branches of government to allocate resources in a manner that best serves the needs of society.
International Dimension
Generally, international laws and treaties establish agreements that nations commit to uphold. However, such agreements are not always created or sustained. Extraterritorial jurisdiction is exercised based on three principles outlined in the UN Charter: equality of states, territorial sovereignty, and non-intervention. This raises questions about when multiple states can prescribe or enforce jurisdiction. The Lotus case establishes two key rules regarding the prescription and enforcement of jurisdiction. It states that jurisdiction is territorial, and a state cannot exercise its jurisdiction within the territory of another state unless there is a rule permitting this. On that same note, states possess a considerable degree of discretion to prescribe jurisdiction over persons, property, and acts within their territory, unless there is a rule prohibiting it.
Political Issue
Supranational organizations provide mechanisms for resolving disputes between nations via arbitration or mediation. When a country is recognized as de jure, it signifies an acknowledgment by other de jure nations that the country possesses sovereignty and the right to exist.
Nevertheless, it is often at each nation’s discretion whether to cooperate or participate. If a nation agrees to engage in the activities of supranational bodies and accept their decisions, it cedes some of its sovereign authority, thereby allocating power to these entities.
To the extent that these bodies or designated individuals can resolve disputes through judicial or quasi-judicial means, or promote treaty obligations resembling laws, the power given to these bodies cumulatively represents its jurisdiction. However, regardless of how powerful each body may seem, the extent to which any of their judgments can be enforced or proposed treaties and conventions become or remain effective within the territorial boundaries of each nation remains a political matter under the sovereign control of each nation.
International and Municipal
The establishment of international organizations, courts, and tribunals raises the complex question of how to coordinate their activities with those of national courts. If these two sets of bodies do not share concurrent jurisdiction, as in the case of the International Criminal Court (ICC), where the relationship is explicitly based on the principle of complementarity—meaning the international court is subsidiary or complementary to national courts—the difficulty is mitigated. However, if the jurisdiction claimed is concurrent or, as in the case of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), the international tribunal prevails over national courts, the challenges become more difficult to resolve politically.
The concept of universal jurisdiction is essential for the operation of global organizations such as the United Nations and the International Court of Justice (ICJ), which collectively assert the importance of maintaining legal entities with jurisdiction over a wide array of matters significant to nations (it is important to distinguish the ICJ from the ICC, as this interpretation of "universal jurisdiction" differs from that enacted in the War Crimes Law (Belgium), which asserts extraterritorial jurisdiction that is unlikely to gain acceptance in any other state under standard public policy provisions). Under Article 34 of the Statute of the ICJ, only nations can be parties in cases before the Court, and under Article 36, the jurisdiction encompasses all cases referred to it by the parties and all matters specifically provided for in the Charter of the United Nations or in treaties and conventions in force. However, to invoke jurisdiction in any given case, all parties must accept the prospective judgment as binding, thereby reducing the risk of wasting the Court's time.
Despite the safeguards incorporated into the constitutions of most of these organizations, courts, and tribunals, the idea of universal jurisdiction remains a contentious issue among those nations that favor unilateral over multilateral solutions through executive or military authority, sometimes referred to as realpolitik-based diplomacy.
In other international contexts, intergovernmental organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) possess socially and economically significant dispute resolution functions. However, even though their jurisdiction may be invoked to hear cases, the power to enforce their decisions remains at the discretion of the affected nations, except that the WTO permits retaliatory actions by successful nations against those found to be in violation of international trade law. On a regional level, groups of nations can create political and legal entities with sometimes complex overlapping provisions detailing the jurisdictional relationships among member states and providing for some degree of harmonization between their national legislative and judicial functions. For instance, both the European Union and the African Union have the potential to evolve into federated nations, although the political barriers to such unification in the face of entrenched nationalism are formidable. Each group may form transnational institutions with declared legislative or judicial powers. For example, in Europe, the European Court of Justice has been granted jurisdiction as the ultimate appellate court for member states on matters of European law. This jurisdiction is entrenched, and its authority could only be denied by a member state if that state asserts its sovereignty and withdraws from the union.
External links
- More information is available at [ Wikipedia:Jurisdiction ]
Chat rooms • What links here • Copyright info • Contact information • Category:Root